Söyler v. Turkey - automatic and indiscriminate ban on prisoners' voting rights

CtEDO 2013-04-30 0,87

sentenced to imprisonment and an administrative fine on the grounds of his activities, which constituted a breach of his right to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Has there been an interference with

CtEDO 2018-12-06 0,87

-mentioned obligation; Recalling that, in the present judgments, the Court found that the general, automatic and indiscriminate restriction on the right of convicted prisoners to vote was incompatible with Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the

CtEDO 2007-10-22 0,87

10 § 1 of the Convention and Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 thereto the applicant complained about the alleged violation of his right to freedom of expression and, in particular, his right to free expression of the opinion in the choice of the

CtEDO 2019-10-08 0,87

and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 6 to 17 May 2019 (Diyarbakır D-type High-Security Prison, Diyarbakır E-type Prison, Diyarbakır T-type Prison No. 2, Istanbul Bakırköy Prison for Women, Istanbul-Metris T-type Priso

CtEDO 2011-02-15 0,87

15 above) in order to allow serving prisoners to vote. However, it made a declaration of incompatibility in respect of section 3(1) of the 1983 Act (see paragraph 16 above). 20. Further details of legal challenges brought by serving prisone