Judgment Cumhuriyet v. Turkey - injunction against national newspaper requested by President Gül

CtEDO 2015-09-15 0,88

decisions to suspend the publication and distribution of the newspapers had amounted to a “penalty” without any legal basis The applicant further complained, under Article 10 of the Convention, that the national courts’ decisions under sect

CtEDO 2013-08-30 0,88

remedy to challenge the assize court’s decision. The applicant further complains under Article 10 that the ban on the distribution of the newspaper violated her right to freedom of expression. The applicant finally complains under Article 1

CtEDO 2013-01-29 0,87

appears that the criminal proceedings brought against the aforementioned applicants are still pending. II. RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 10. The description of the relevant domestic law and practice may be found in the case of Ürper and Others v. T

CtEDO 2017-12-08 0,87

Communicated on 8 December 2017 SECOND SECTION Application no. 70769/11 Barış GÜLLÜ against Turkey lodged on 25 October 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a Turkish national who was born in 1980 and lives abroad. At the time o

CtEDO 2017-01-16 0,87

those statements had constituted propaganda in favour of the PKK. On 19 July 2011 the Court of Cassation upheld the judgment of 24 March 2008. COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention that his conviction