Decision Khider v. France - the applicant’s complaints are inadmissible in the light of the Convention

CtEDO 2016-08-30 0,89

Court finds that the complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected, pursuant to Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanim

CtEDO 2005-02-01 0,89

to Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Declares admissible, without prejudging the merits, the applicant's complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to the quashing, on 13 Decemb

CtEDO 2003-02-04 0,89

doubt whatsoever that it constitutes an abuse of the right of application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It follows that the applications lodged by Mr Gérard Duringer and Mr Forest Grunge must be declared inadmissib

CtEDO 2018-05-29 0,89

the Court finds that the applicants’ complaints concerning the inadequacy of the judicial response in the aftermath of the incident are manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be declared inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 o

CtEDO 2000-11-21 0,89

the application must be rejected as being manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, DECLARES ADMISSIBLE, without prejudging the merits of the case, the applicant’