Decision Savickas and others v. Lithuania - effective remedies for excessive length of proceedings

CtEDO 2018-03-29 0,89

meaning of Article 13 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Savickas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 66365/09 and 5 others, §§ 86-88, 15 October 2013)? If an effective domestic remedy did exist, have the applicants exhausted it? The parti

CtEDO 2023-01-30 0,89

effect and could no longer be questioned. Under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention the applicant complains about the excessive length of the criminal proceedings. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Has the applicant complied with the time-limit laid

CtEDO 2012-12-18 0,88

ings had been largely due to the conduct of the parties, including that of the applicant company. 13. The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the applicable

CtEDO 2025-03-13 0,88

6 § 1 -excessive length of criminal proceedings; Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings. 12. 42674/23 02/12/2023 Mykyta Vadymovych SELEZNYOV 1995 Art. 3 - inadequate con

CtEDO 2021-05-21 0,88

their conclusions. Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings are set out in the Court’s decision in the case of Vokurka v. the Czech Republic (