Judgments Ringier Axel Springier v. Slovakia (Nos. 2 and 3) - libel cases against newspaper Nový Cas

CtEDO 2012-10-18 0,90

v. Slovakia ((dec.), no. 35090/07, 4 October 2011). COMPLAINTS 35. The applicant company complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the domestic courts had failed to support their judgments in the libel case by adequate reasoning.

CtEDO 2014-01-07 0,89

ed the applicant company for libel, relying on the rules on the protection of personal integrity under Articles 11 et seq. of the Civil Code (Law no. 40/1964 Coll., as amended), and seeking the same redress as in its proposal of 16 July 200

CtEDO 2013-05-29 0,89

by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted, DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case; and DECIDES to close the examination thereof. Action report Application No. 41262/05

CtEDO 2012-10-18 0,89

been a solid factual basis. 34. On 5 June 2008 the Bratislava Regional Court ( Krajský súd ) upheld the contested judgment. It concurred with the applicant company that through his participation in the TV quiz A. had become a person of publ

CtEDO 2017-07-12 0,89

, 27 April 2010; Juričić v. Croatia, no. 58222/09, §§ 72-78, 26 July 2011; Trančíková v. Slovakia, no. 17127/12, §§ 37-47, 13 January 2015; Čičmanec v. Slovakia, no. 65302/11, § 59-65, 28 June 2016; and contrast Ringier Axel Springer Slovak