Judgment Tali v. Estonia - use of pepper spray against prisoner

CtEDO 2012-09-07 0,91

3 and 4 July 2009 and the authorities’ failure to carry out an effective investigation into his allegations of ill-treatment. He also invokes Article 13 of the Convention in this context. ITMarkFactsComplaintsEND QUESTION 1. Did the applica

CtEDO 2014-02-13 0,90

and dismissed the applicant’s complaint. It found that the use of the means of restraint, special equipment, physical force and service weapons had been lawful. The court considered that the prison had been authorised to use preventive meas

CtEDO 2025-01-10 0,89

described incident, the applicant was given a disciplinary punishment of having to spend five days in the punishment cell. Furthermore, in view of the given incident, the applicant’s overall criminal past, his history of aggressive behaviou

CtEDO 2023-10-05 0,88

93 and 25091/94, §§ 604-605, 13 November 2003)? 2. Has the applicant been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, through the use of pepper spray against him during his arrest ( see Tali v. Est

CtEDO 2021-08-20 0,88

Published on 6 September 2021 SECOND SECTION Application no. 27753/19 Abdallah EL-ASMAR against Denmark lodged on 13 May 2019 communicated on 20 August 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE On 4 April 2017, while the applicant was serving a priso