Judgment Ostace v. Romania - request to reopen proceedings to establish paternity

CtEDO 2019-10-02 0,88

ed on 2 October 2019 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 20097/15 Ilie LAZĂR against Romania lodged on 16 April 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns limitations imposed by law to bringing an action to contest the paternity of

CtEDO 2019-12-20 0,88

Communicated on 20 December 2019 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 7515/16 Daniel-Nicolae NIȚULESCU against Romania lodged on 28 January 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the dismissal by a final judgment of 22 October 2

CtEDO 2019-02-13 0,88

Communicated on 13 February 2019 THIRD SECTION Application no. 47443/14 Peđa BOLJEVIĆ against Serbia lodged on 20 June 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the establishment of paternity based on DNA testing methods whic

CtEDO 2014-01-10 0,87

‐ I; Jevremović v. Serbia, no. 3150/05, §§ 97-112, 17 July 2007, and Jäggi v. Switzerland, no. 58757/00, §§ 28-44, ECHR 2006 ‐ X)? 2. Has the length of the paternity disputes been excessive within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convent

CtEDO 2024-02-15 0,87

proceedings at stake and that he is currently unable to obtain recognition of his paternity and to maintain contact with his daughter. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of his civil right