ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 16.12.2025 RO

Judgment Gondert v. Germany and Decision De Simone v. Germany - Obligation to provide reasons when refusing referral request to CJEU

HOTĂRÂRE
16.12.2025
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Gondert v. Germany and Decision De Simone v. Germany - Obligation to provide reasons when refusing referral request to CJEU (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-12-02
0,90
DE SIMONE v. GERMANY
is necessary to seek a preliminary ruling from the CJEU to enable them to give judgment. It reiterates that the Convention does not guarantee, as such, the right to have a case referred by a domestic court to another national or internation
CtEDO 2022-09-01
0,90
GONDERT v. GERMANY
Published on 19 September 2022 THIRD SECTION Application no. 34701/21 Heinz-Günter GONDERT against Germany lodged on 2 July 2021 communicated on 1 September 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns civil proceedings where th
CtEDO 2022-09-01
0,89
KOBLENZER v. GERMANY
to grant the applicant’s request for a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) render the proceedings unfair (see Sanofi Pasteur v. France, no. 25137/16, §§ 67-68, 13 February 2020)? In this context, did the applicant
CtEDO 2025-07-04
0,88
BASTIAN v. GERMANY
for a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) render the proceedings unfair in violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, §§ 54-62, 20 Septem
CtEDO 2022-09-01
0,88
MANNANTHARA NATARAJAN v. GERMANY
applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of her civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, did the refusal of the Federal Social Court to refer the applicant’s questions to the
Sursă