Judgment Biao v. Denmark - refusal to grant family reunion justified

CtEDO 2012-05-11 0,90

the Convention, alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Was the Danish authorities’ refusal to grant the second applicant family reunification in Denmark in breach of the applicants’ right to

CtEDO 2014-03-25 0,89

while Article 5 § 2 concerns the principle of non-discrimination. According to the report, it is not a mandatory rule that the Contracting States are obliged to observe in all situations. Against that background, Article 5 is considered to

CtEDO 2016-05-24 0,88

al was unlawful because it was contrary to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. If the refusal was not contrary to Article 8, they submitted as their alternative claim that it was contrary to the prohibition against discrim

CtEDO 2018-09-07 0,88

. The applicant instituted proceedings before the courts complaining that the refusal to grant him family reunion with his wife was in breach of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8, and of Article 8 taken alone. He submitted that

CtEDO 2018-04-10 0,88

Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)155 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Biao against Denmark (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 April 2018 at the 1313 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No. Cas