HAÇİKOĞLU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice

CtEDO 2018-05-29 0,90

the Court finds that the applicants’ complaints concerning the inadequacy of the judicial response in the aftermath of the incident are manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be declared inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 o

CtEDO 2018-12-04 0,89

respondent Government’s declaration under Article 6 of the Convention and of the modalities for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein; Decides to strike that part of the application out of its list of cases in accord

CtEDO 2017-04-25 0,89

note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declaration under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention and of the modalities for ensuring compliance with the undertakings referred to therein; Decides to strike that part of the application out o

CtEDO 2021-03-09 0,89

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Tribunal established by law);Violation

CtEDO 2021-02-09 0,89

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Ar