Advisory opinion on the procedural status and rights of a biological parent in proceedings for the adoption of an adult - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

RESPONDENT

FIN

HOTĂRÂRE

13.09.2024

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Advisory opinion on the procedural status and rights of a biological parent in proceedings for the adoption of an adult - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2024-02-12

0,88

POKORNÝ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

/20). It held that the courts had duly examined his arguments and explained why it was not in the interest of the minor children to accept the applicant’s request, the best interest of the children being the primary criterion which could pr

CtEDO 2024-09-05

0,88

A.P. AND A.M. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

child to significant media coverage causing her additional distress, as described in the reports of the crisis centre. 9. On 1 July 2020 the child was transferred into her father’s custody. According to the crisis centre’s summary report of

CtEDO 2024-05-16

0,88

CASE OF MIRZOYAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

čková uplatnila k rozsudku souhlasné stanovisko, ve kterém upozornila, že se Soud věnoval ochraně práv stěžovatele, nezaobíral se ale dostatečně ochranou nejlepších zájmů jeho dětí, kterým v důsledku rozhodnutí hrozí ztráta vlasti nebo otce

CtEDO 2021-07-06

0,88

CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

Souhlasné stanovisko soudkyně Elósegui dále rozvádí potřebu nalezení způsobu ochrany zájmů dětí v případech střetu zájmů mezi rodiči a dětmi. Není příliš logické a rozumné, aby dítě nebylo řádně informováno, že je účastníkem řízení před mez

CtEDO 2022-05-16

0,88

VINŠKOVSKÝ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

s child to develop (see, notably, Honner v. France, no. 19511/16, 12 November 2020, with further references)? If so, have they fulfilled that obligation and have they exercised exceptional diligence in view of the risk that the passage of t

Sursă