ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 22.05.2014 RO

Judgment Gray v. Germany - criminal proceedings in Germany against German doctor responsible for patient's death in UK were adequate

HOTĂRÂRE
22.05.2014
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2014
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Gray v. Germany - criminal proceedings in Germany against German doctor responsible for patient's death in UK were adequate (CtEDO, 2014)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2014-05-22
0,91
CASE OF GRAY v. GERMANY
ed explicitly to the deficiencies in the recruitment, training and supervision of foreign locum doctors in the United Kingdom. These deficiencies were at the origin of a subsequent report by the Coroner to the Secretary of Health and result
CtEDO 2012-12-18
0,88
GRAY v. GERMANY AND UNITED KINGDOM
FIFTH SECTION Application no. 49278/09 Stuart and Rory GRAY against Germany and the United Kingdom lodged on 10 September 2009 The facts and complaints in these cases have been summarised in the Court’s decision on admissibility, which is a
CtEDO 2014-03-06
0,87
BECHT v. GERMANY
time of his offences and conviction? In particular, having regard to the Court’s case-law in the case of M. v. Germany (no. 19359/04, ECHR 2009) and a number of follow-up cases (see, in particular, Kallweit v. Germany, no. 17792/07, 13 Janu
CtEDO 2014-01-06
0,87
EBERHARD v. GERMANY and 1 other application
within any of the sub-paragraphs (a) to (f) of Article 5 § 1? 2. Taking into consideration, in particular, the Court’s conclusions in its judgment in the case of M. v. Germany (cited above), was a heavier penalty imposed on the applicant th
CtEDO 2017-07-13
0,86
MENG v. GERMANY
Darmstadt Regional Court? In particular, was that court, which tried and convicted the applicant of murder of her husband out of greed, jointly committed with G.S., impartial, in light of, in particular, the presiding judge’s involvement in
Sursă