CtEDO 26.09.2024 RO

Decision Missaoui and Akhandaf v. Belgium - application concerning ban on wearing a burkini at a public swimming pool rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies

HOTĂRÂRE
26.09.2024
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Decision Missaoui and Akhandaf v. Belgium - application concerning ban on wearing a burkini at a public swimming pool rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2024-03-25
0,91
MISSAOUI ET AKHANDAF c. BELGIQUE
la condition tenant à l’épuisement des voies de recours internes exigeait, en l’espèce, l’introduction d’un « pourvoi sur réquisition », indépendamment de l’avis négatif qui a été émis ou des avis négatifs qui auraient pu être émis? 2. Le G
CtEDO 2024-09-03
0,90
MISSAOUI ET AKHANDAF c. BELGIQUE
l’intervention de ces avocats contribue à l’exercice utile des droits de la défense, assure au recours en cassation un caractère effectif et procure aux justiciables les garanties fondamentales de l’article 6 de la Convention (Cass., 15 déc
CtEDO 2017-01-10
0,88
CASE OF OSMANOĞLU AND KOCABAȘ v. SWITZERLAND
accompanying measures (separate changing rooms and showers, and the option of wearing a burkini). 20. The Federal Supreme Court also found irrelevant the applicants’ argument that their children were receiving private swimming lessons, hold
CtEDO 2022-09-22
0,86
CASE OF VERBAUWHEDE AND PARTI DU TRAVAIL DE BELGIQUE AGAINST BELGIUM
Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)184 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Michael Verbauwhede and Parti du Travail de Belgique against Belgium (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 September 2022 at the 1443 rd mee
CtEDO 2025-05-09
0,86
MUJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
ES 1. Has there been a violation of the applicant’s freedom to manifest her religion, contrary to Article 9 of the Convention, as a result of the prohibition to wear a hijab with military uniform (see Ebrahimian v. France, no. 64846/11, ECH
Sursă