Judgment Konovalova v. Russia - presence of medical students during child birth and privacy rights

CtEDO 2016-04-25 0,87

the Convention? 2. More specifically, has there been a failure by the State to comply with its positive obligation to secure the applicant’s right to respect for her family life guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention? In particular: (a)

CtEDO 2025-10-16 0,87

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for priv

CtEDO 2016-11-15 0,87

. 31039/11, 48511/11, 76810/12, 14618/13 and 13817/14, 15 March 2016), was there a violation of the applicant’s right to be protected against discrimination under Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with his right to respect f

CtEDO 2014-04-01 0,87

applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention, taken alone or in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention, that he was a victim of discrimination on account of his health status in the determination of his application for a res

CtEDO 2016-06-28 0,87

; Kovaleva and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 6025/09, 25 June 2009; Denisov v. Russia, (dec.), no. 33408/03, 6 May 2004; and AO Uralmash v. Russia (dec.), no. 13338/03, 10 April 2003)? 2. Did the removal order of 10 October 2013 constitute a