Judgment Panju v. Belgium - remedy for complaining about length of criminal proceedings

CtEDO 2023-11-07 0,88

before the Court of Cassation an application for just satisfaction for excessive length of proceedings in accordance with Law no. 4239/2014. She argues that this remedy, as set forth in the law, would not have been effective, because: (1) j

CtEDO 2017-06-07 0,88

of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)537 ); Noting that the general measures adopted by the authorities have had a positive impact on the length of the criminal investigations, including in the Brussels Cou

CtEDO 2014-08-05 0,88

§ 1 of the Convention about the excessive length of proceedings before the Berlin Constitutional Court. He further complains that the German law does not provide for an effective legal remedy against the excessive length of proceedings befo

CtEDO 2024-06-13 0,88

DD(2024)376 ); Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the domestic proceedings have been terminated; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by th

CtEDO 2021-05-21 0,87

their conclusions. Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for excessive length of judicial proceedings are set out in the Court’s decision in the case of Vokurka v. the Czech Republic (