Judgment Shvydka v. Ukraine - ten days’ detention for an act of political dissent was excessive

CtEDO 2024-11-14 0,90

2022 to 08/11/2022 9 month(s) and 28 day(s) Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 25/02/2021-14/09/2022 - the domestic courts provided repetitive and insufficient reasons for their decisions extending the applicant’s pre-tr

CtEDO 2019-01-17 0,90

detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis: On 26/10/2010 the Golosiyivskyy District Court while transferring the criminal case against the applicant to the Pecherskyy Disrtict Court of Kyiv under the jurisdi

CtEDO 2021-06-10 0,89

68-70, ECHR 2015) none Art. 5 (3) - lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention – detention on remand from 6/06/2013 to 4/12/2013, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts. 2,600 250 42209/15 21/08/2015 Oleg Mykolayovych BI

CtEDO 2021-02-11 0,89

‐ pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2] 48021/13 18/07/2013 Viktor Grygorovych STUZHUK 1963 10/04/2010 to 03/04/2013 2 years and 11 months and 25 days Art. 5 (4) -

CtEDO 2018-01-11 0,89

the cell; lights turned on in cell for 24 hours; shower only once a week; bad nutrition. Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention: The applicant was arrested on 11 November 2010. On 16 December 2013 the Svyatoshynskyy District C