ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 04.11.2014 RO

Grand Chamber Judgment Tarakhel v. Switzerland - return of family of asylum seekers to Italy only with individual guarantees

HOTĂRÂRE
04.11.2014
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2014
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Grand Chamber Judgment Tarakhel v. Switzerland - return of family of asylum seekers to Italy only with individual guarantees (CtEDO, 2014)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-06-11
0,93
CASE OF TARAKHEL AGAINST SWITZERLAND
Government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2014)1451 ); Having noted with sat
CtEDO 2014-12-18
0,90
U.A.H.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS AND ITALY
findings in the case of Tarakhel v. Switzerland ([GC], no. 29217/12, 4 November 2014), what guarantees, if any, have been given by your Government to the Government of the Netherlands in connection with the applicant’s transfer to Italy? 2.
CtEDO 2015-06-11
0,90
AFFAIRE TARAKHEL CONTRE LA SUISSE
quérants devaient être renvoyés en Italie sans que les autorités suisses aient au préalable obtenu des autorités italiennes une garantie individuelle concernant une prise en charge adaptée à l’âge des enfants et la préservation de l’unité f
CtEDO 2014-11-04
0,89
CASE OF TARAKHEL v. SWITZERLAND
um seekers [could] not always be taken care of by the authorities or private charities”, there was no evidence in the file capable of “rebutting the presumption that Italy complie[d] with its obligations under public international law.” Wit
CtEDO 2015-01-08
0,89
S.M.H. v. THE NETHERLANDS
, §§ 25 29 and §§ 32-39, 4 June 2013); and Mohammed Hussein v. the Netherlands and Italy ((dec.), no. 27725/10, §§ 25-28 and 33-50, 2 April 2013). COMPLAINT 29. The applicant complains that the removal to Italy of herself and her children w
Sursă