Judgment Vasilescu v. Belgium - structural problem of prison overcrowding in Belgium

CtEDO 2024-06-13 0,88

both applicants had passed away before the Court delivered its judgments and that the just satisfaction awarded by the Court was paid to their heirs and considering that the question of individual measures was therefore resolved; Recalling

CtEDO 2024-05-21 0,88

STIONS AUX PARTIES 1. Les conditions de détention subies par le requérant dans la prison de Bruges constituent-elles un traitement contraire à l’article 3 de la Convention (voir notamment Vasilescu c. Belgique, n o 64682/12, 25 novembre 201

CtEDO 2024-06-13 0,88

d the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments (see document DH-DD(2022)1288 ) and those regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court; Consideri

CtEDO 2025-12-10 0,88

and DH-DD(2025)852 ); Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants have ceased serving their prison sentence, and that the just satisfaction awarded by the Court was paid; Recalling that the q

CtEDO 2019-09-24 0,88

unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, their health and well-being are adequately secured (see Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000‐XI, and Melnītis v.