ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 02.12.2014 RO

Judgment Cumhuriyetçi Egitim Ve Kültür Merkezi Vakfi v. Turkey - privileged status granted to places of worship is discriminatory

HOTĂRÂRE
02.12.2014
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2014
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Cumhuriyetçi Egitim Ve Kültür Merkezi Vakfi v. Turkey - privileged status granted to places of worship is discriminatory (CtEDO, 2014)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2014-12-02
0,87
CASE OF EMEL BOYRAZ v. TURKEY
Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Articl
CtEDO 2014-12-02
0,87
Emel Boyraz v. Turkey
Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Articl
CtEDO 2021-01-21
0,87
CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. ARMENIA
2017; and Zubac v. Croatia, no. 40160/12, §§ 76-78, 5 April 2018)? 3. Has the applicant organisation suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of its Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Artic
CtEDO 2025-05-26
0,87
BEKTAȘ v. TÜRKİYE and 2 other applications
the circumstances of each case, did the national authorities, in their decisions, adequately examine and appropriately balance the applicants’ right to freedom of expression against the other interests at stake, in the light of the criteria
CtEDO 2024-05-21
0,87
MAVRAKıS v. TÜRKIYE and 2 other applications
Articles 9 and 11 of the Convention (see, for example, İzzettin Doğan and others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, 26 April 2016; Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) v. the United Kingdom, no. 11002/05, §§ 37-53, 27 F
Sursă