Judgment Ibrahim and Others v. the UK - delaying of access to a lawyer during police questioning

CtEDO 2016-09-13 0,88

Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right

CtEDO 2016-09-13 0,88

Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right

CtEDO 2014-02-06 0,87

subsequent interview with him before his appearance in court. He may not, after caution and charge, be further questioned by the police. He may, if he chooses, make a voluntary statement but that is taken by officers not involved in the inq

CtEDO 2014-03-04 0,87

R.M.M., the Appeal Court accepted the reference ([2012] HCJAC 120) and, notwithstanding the view of the Commission, then gave the appellant leave to lodge an additional ground of appeal based on Cadder ([2012] HCJAC 122). Having heard submi

CtEDO 2010-09-14 0,87

ed to suggest that that was the reason for his having made the witness statement. On the contrary, he made the witness statement because he wanted to assist the police. In this type of case, the court is only likely to conclude there has be