Larionovs v. Latvia - Tess v. Latvia - retroactive application of criminal law - 1949 mass deportation

CtEDO 2019-05-10 0,87

decisions? 3.3. Can an appeal against the decision of the State Border Guard Service denying the applicants entry into Latvia be considered an effective domestic remedy, in view of the fact that it does not have automatic suspensive effect

CtEDO 2022-02-03 0,86

Court accepted a properly drafted complaint lodged by the second applicant’s brother raising the issue of discrimination. Given the circumstances, the Court considers that by failing to lodge a proper constitutional complaint through means

CtEDO 2016-12-15 0,86

on 25 January 2013 the judge decided to continue the applicant’s detention, using largely the same wording as in the previous decisions. In addition, she noted that the twenty-four-month period allowed by section 277(7) of the Criminal Proc

CtEDO 2017-09-28 0,86

the Supreme Administrative Court upheld the first ‐ instance court’s decision in its entirety. B. Relevant domestic law and practice For relevant domestic law and practice concerning conditions of detention, see Mironovas and Others v. Lith

CtEDO 2014-09-10 0,86

‐ VII; and Zavoloka v. Latvia, no. 58447/00, §§ 34-40, 7 July 2009; also see, mutatis mutandis, Kontrová v. Slovakia, no. 7510/04, §§ 59-65, 31 May 2007)? As concerns all cases: As regards the criminal proceedings the parties are requested