Decision NML CAPITAL LTD v. France - inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies

CtEDO 2015-01-13 0,90

quant aux perspectives de succès d’un recours donné qui n’est pas de toute évidence voué à l’échec ne constitue pas une raison valable pour justifier la non ‐ utilisation de recours internes (voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres, Grande Stevens et

CtEDO 2017-05-16 0,88

4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 15 June 2017. Hasan Bakırcı Julia Laffranque Deputy Re

CtEDO 2017-06-27 0,88

, 16 June 2015). 17. As a result, taking into account the Government’s preliminary objection, the Court concludes that the application must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. F

CtEDO 2013-09-03 0,88

Court notes that there is nothing in the case file to allow it to conclude that an action for damages would have no reasonable prospects of success and was bound to fail. It follows that the application must be rejected under Article 35 §§

CtEDO 2017-12-12 0,87

before the Court. 22. It follows that the Government’s objection is upheld and the applicant’s complaint must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For these reasons, the Court, u