Judgment Muršic v. Croatia - general principles on prison overcrowding

CtEDO 2023-02-02 0,88

proof is shifted to the respondent Government who alone have access to information capable of corroborating or refuting these allegations (see Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 127 and 128, ECHR 2016). The Court notes that in the pres

CtEDO 2018-07-12 0,88

It must therefore be declared admissible. B. Merits 24. A restatement of the general principles concerning the examination of conditions of detention under Article 3 may be found in the Court’s pilot judgments against Poland (see Orchowsk i

CtEDO 2016-10-20 0,88

By a letter of 7 December 2010 the Ombudsperson invited the applicant to further substantiate his complaints. 36. The applicant replied to that request on 21 December 2010, indicating that the sentence-execution judge and the three-judge pa

CtEDO 2017-10-17 0,88

tention. It considers that even though the applicants were awarded EUR 406 (in the case of the first applicant – see paragraphs 7 and 10 above) and EUR 435 (in the case of the second applicant – see paragraphs 14 and 17 above), those sums,