Judgment Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia - police entrapment complaint inadmissible

CtEDO 2015-06-23 0,89

it has jurisdiction to examine the allegations, the Court has not found any appearance of a breach of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols in that part of the application. 20. It follows that the application

CtEDO 2022-10-06 0,88

4 (see, for similar reasoning, Bannikova v. Russia, no. 18757/06, §§ 74-79, 4 November 2010). For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 27 October 2022. Vikt

CtEDO 2020-07-09 0,88

2016), the Russian courts took all possible steps to verify each version to be certain that the acts imputed to the applicants did not result from unlawful actions on the part of investigative authorities. Having regard to the scope of the

CtEDO 2021-12-07 0,88

foregoing, the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention must be rejected for the failure to comply with the six ‐ month time-limit within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the

CtEDO 2018-11-15 0,88

any defects on behalf of the enforcement authorities. In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons,