ECHR extends time allowed for observations on inter-State cases Ukraine v. Russia

CtEDO 2015-10-15 0,89

Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Liberty of person;Security of person;Article 5-1-f - Extradition) (Ukra

CtEDO 2015-10-15 0,89

Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Liberty of person;Security of person;Article 5-1-f - Extradition) (Ukra

CtEDO 2021-08-30 0,89

Article 8 § 2 (compare Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, §§ 95-100, ECHR 2003 ‐ IX (extracts) and Kotiy v. Ukraine, no. 28718/09, §§ 62-76, 5 March 2015). The parties are invited to comment on the exhaustion of domestic remedi

CtEDO 2021-10-14 0,88

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation

CtEDO 2020-09-23 0,88

ing during court hearings (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 113-39, ECHR 2014 (extracts)? 2. Did the decisions of the domestic courts ordering the applicant’s detention on remand and extending his f