Grand Chamber judgment Khoroshenko v. Russia - strict limits on life prisoner's family visits

CtEDO 2011-01-13 0,91

te a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and/or family life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention? In particular: (a) Does the lack of a right to long-term family visits pursue a legitimate aim? (b) Doe

CtEDO 2015-06-30 0,90

-term visits during his detention in the special-regime correction colony. None of the applicant’s respective requests for a visit was refused. 28. On 24 August 2004 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court of Russia,

CtEDO 2017-04-06 0,90

Communicated on 6 April 2017 THIRD SECTION Application no. 34963/12 Andrey Anatolyevich YUDIN against Russia and 16 other applications (see list appended) STATEMENT OF FACTS A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. A. The circum

CtEDO 2019-03-21 0,90

the Government argued that the ban on long-term family visits for life prisoners served the legitimate purpose of preventing disorder and crimes, as well as protection of health and rights of other people. The Government referred in that co

CtEDO 2019-09-10 0,89

s); and Lebois v. Bulgaria, no. 67482/14, § 61, 19 October 2017). Where, however, domestic law allows prisoners to conduct telephone conversations with their relatives, any restriction imposed thereon may be regarded as an interference with