CtEDO 30.06.2015 RO

Judgment Abdulla Ali v. the UK - no unfairness from prejudicial reporting in terrorist trial

HOTĂRÂRE
30.06.2015
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Abdulla Ali v. the UK - no unfairness from prejudicial reporting in terrorist trial (CtEDO, 2015)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-06-30
0,89
CASE OF ABDULLA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
not a case concerned with pre-trial publicity but with publicity following a conviction. The fact that it was a trial following a conviction on one count in our view is an important factor that may be viewed as more significant than pre-tri
CtEDO 2016-09-06
0,87
AHMED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
RC’s investigations as inadequate. In our view, there was nothing more that the CCRC could reasonably have done. 41. The safety of the convictions is not in doubt and therefore the application for permission to appeal against conviction is
CtEDO 2021-03-11
0,86
AL-WAHEED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention. Done in English and noti
CtEDO 2016-09-13
0,86
Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC]
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right
CtEDO 2016-09-13
0,86
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right
Sursă