CtEDO 07.07.2015 Auto

Rutkowski and Others v. Poland

RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
07.07.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46 - Pilot judgment;Systemic problem;Article 46-2 - Measures of a general character);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Rutkowski and Others v. Poland (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistare inadmisibilă;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedură civilă;Procedură penală;art. 6-1 - Timp rezonabil);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace); Statul pârât să ia măsuri de caracter general (art. 46 - Hotărâre pilotă;Problema sistemică;art. 46-2 - Măsuri de caracter general); Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-07-07
0,99
CASE OF RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);
CtEDO 2022-07-21
0,95
CASE OF BIELIŃSKI v. POLAND
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2022-07-21
0,95
CASE OF BIELIŃSKI v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2018-04-12
0,94
Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - R
CtEDO 2018-04-12
0,94
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - R
Sursă