ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 03.09.2015 RO

Judgment Sérvulo & Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL v. Portugal - search and seizure at law firm’s offices

HOTĂRÂRE
03.09.2015
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Sérvulo & Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL v. Portugal - search and seizure at law firm’s offices (CtEDO, 2015)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2024-11-05
0,88
CASE OF NEZIRIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
the search warrant issued by the investigating judge, the Appeals Panel’s decision (see paragraph 2 above), nor the prosecutor’s order for the mobile phone to be examined (see paragraph 3 above) made provision for safeguarding any potential
CtEDO 2023-07-10
0,86
KAVEČANSKÝ v. SLOVAKIA
Published on 28 August 2023 FIRST SECTION Application no. 49617/22 Vojtech KAVEČANSKÝ against Slovakia lodged on 17 October 2022 communicated on 10 July 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the search and seizure of elec
CtEDO 2015-11-05
0,86
CASE OF QING v. PORTUGAL
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Re
CtEDO 2020-09-15
0,86
GOTALIMPA, LDA. v. PORTUGAL
July 2015, and Brito Ferrinho Bexiga Villa-Nova v. Portugal, no. 69436/10, §§ 42-44, 1 December 2015)? 2. If so, did the Tax Authority’s access to the identity and bank information of the applicant’s bank cheque recipients constitute an int
CtEDO 2018-05-30
0,86
PAIXÃO MOREIRA SÁ FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
account that the same formation had already convicted the applicant on a previous appeal and also taking into consideration the statements made to the press on 2 May 2012 by one of its judges (see mutatis mutandis Saraiva de Carvalho v. Por
Sursă