ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 04.12.2015 RO

Rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo reguliruyushchee proslushivaniye mobilnyh telefonov ne sootvetstvuyet Evropeyskoy Konventsii - PR in Russian

HOTĂRÂRE
04.12.2015
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo reguliruyushchee proslushivaniye mobilnyh telefonov ne sootvetstvuyet Evropeyskoy Konventsii - PR in Russian (CtEDO, 2015)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-12-04
0,88
CASE OF ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA
to unauthorised interception. 13. On 26 April 2006 the St Petersburg City Court upheld the judgment on appeal. It confirmed the District Court’s finding that the applicant had failed to prove that his telephone communications had been inter
CtEDO 2018-11-20
0,87
FATULLAYEV v. RUSSIA
‐ il eu violation du droit du requérant à la liberté d’expression au sens de l’article 10 de la Convention (comparer avec Karzhev c. Bulgarie [comité], n o 60607/08, §§ 30 ‐ 40, 7 septembre 2017, Milisavljević c. Serbie, n o 50123/06, §§ 27
CtEDO 2016-03-02
0,87
ACHILOV AND IVANOV v. RUSSIA
The decisions did not contain the name of the authorising judge and no official stamp of the authorising court could be seen thereon. Instead, Mr Achilov sought the institution of criminal proceedings against the officers who had carried ou
CtEDO 2018-11-19
0,87
IVANOV c. RUSSIE
-il eu violation du droit du requérant à la liberté d’expression au sens de l’article 10 de la Convention (comparer avec Karzhev c. Bulgarie [comité], n o 60607/08, §§ 30 ‐ 40, 7 septembre 2017, Milisavljević c. Serbie, n o 50123/06, §§ 27
CtEDO 2018-01-15
0,87
ZAO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENSTVO ROSBALT v. RUSSIA
nt company’s right? Did they apply standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10 of the Convention? Did they base themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see OOO Izdatelskiy Tsentr Kvart
Sursă