ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 07.01.2016 RO

Judgment Bergmann v. Germany - preventive detention of convicted offender for therapy purposes under new legal regime

HOTĂRÂRE
07.01.2016
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Bergmann v. Germany - preventive detention of convicted offender for therapy purposes under new legal regime (CtEDO, 2016)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-01-07
0,90
CASE OF BERGMANN v. GERMANY
serious offences. On 31 January 2012 the Celle Court of Appeal quashed that decision on the grounds that detention under the Therapy Detention Act could only be ordered once the preventive detention of the person concerned had been terminat
CtEDO 2016-09-19
0,90
ODERMATT v. GERMANY
M. v. Germany (cited above), K v. Germany (no. 61827/09, 7 June 2012), Glien (cited above) and Bergmann (cited above), was a heavier penalty imposed on the applicant than the one which was applicable at the time of the commission of his off
CtEDO 2012-03-22
0,90
CASE OF OSTERMUNCHNER v. GERMANY
case of M. v. Germany (cited above; see §§ 137 ss. of the Federal Constitutional Court’s judgment). It stressed, in particular, that the constitutional requirement of establishing a difference between preventive detention and detention for
CtEDO 2014-12-22
0,90
ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
ordered in relation to an unlawful act committed by the person concerned. Article 63 of the Criminal Code provides that if someone commits an unlawful act without criminal responsibility or with diminished criminal responsibility, the court
CtEDO 2012-06-07
0,90
CASE OF G v. GERMANY
. of the Federal Constitutional Court’s judgment). It stressed, in particular, that the constitutional requirement of establishing a difference between preventive detention and detention for serving a term of imprisonment and the principles
Sursă