Judgment Navalnyy and Ofitserov v. Russia - conviction of opposition activist

CtEDO 2017-12-21 0,89

law and that they were convicted of criminal offences indistinguishable from regular commercial activities. Relying on Article 18 in conjunction with Articles 6 and 7 of the Convention the first applicant claims that his prosecution and con

CtEDO 2023-03-09 0,88

on the Russian authorities urgently to take measures to erase the consequences for the applicants of their arbitrary and unfair convictions, in particular the prohibition on Mr Alexey Navalnyy to stand as a candidate during the 2017/2018 pr

CtEDO 2018-05-15 0,88

THIRD SECTION CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA (Application no. 32963/16) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 May 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Navalnyy v. Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (T

CtEDO 2026-02-03 0,88

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-a - After conviction);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure pr

CtEDO 2022-03-09 0,88

in cases to which it is a party; DEEPLY DEPLORED that despite its numerous calls, Mr Aleksey Navalnyy remains in detention and the convictions impugned by the Court’s judgments in these cases stand; EXHORTED again the authorities to take al