Judgment Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria - threatened demolition of a residential house

CtEDO 2020-10-02 0,90

November 2015 the Plovdiv Administrative Court upheld the deputy-mayor’s order vis-à-vis the applicant (see реш. No 2383 от 25.11.2015 г. по адм. д. No 815/2015 г., АдмС-Пловдив). It noted that the building permit obtained by the applicant

CtEDO 2016-04-21 0,89

Municipal Ombudsman urged the Minister of Regional Development to halt the demolition on the basis that, although formally lawful, it would have a disproportionate impact on the applicants. In response, on 25 September 2015 the Directorate’

CtEDO 2015-10-08 0,89

to live, or the nature of the illegality tainting the construction, were irrelevant to the lawfulness of the demolition order. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Is the impending demolition of the house inhabited by the two applicants since 2005 n

CtEDO 2016-04-27 0,89

are set out in paragraphs 28-29 of the Court’s judgment in the case of Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria (no. 46577/15, 21 April 2016). 39. The statutory provisions and case-law of the administrative courts relating to orders for the demoli

CtEDO 2020-11-10 0,89

2018 and upheld on appeal by the Cluj-Napoca County Court on 27 June 2019 (notified to the applicants on 29 November 2019). The courts considered that the applicants had not shown sufficient diligence regarding their obligation to comply wi