CtEDO 05.12.2024 RO

Judgment Giesbert and Others v. France - Conviction of publication director of Le Point and two journalists for defamation did not infringe their freedom of expression

HOTĂRÂRE
05.12.2024
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Giesbert and Others v. France - Conviction of publication director of Le Point and two journalists for defamation did not infringe their freedom of expression (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2011-06-08
0,87
CASE OF PATUREL AND 10 OTHER CASES AGAINST FRANCE
el, Giniewski, Brasilier, Dupuis et autres, Desjardin, Chalabi, Brunet-Lecomte et Sarl Lyon Mag’, Orban et autres, Brunet-Lecomte et Tanant, Brunet-Lecomte et Lyon Mag’, Haguenauer against France Introductory case summary These cases concer
CtEDO 2022-12-09
0,87
RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ AND MORGADO GONÇALVES RIBEIRO v. PORTUGAL
Published on 2 January 2023 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 389/19 Paula Cristina RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ and João Paulo MORGADO GONCALVES RIBEIRO against Portugal lodged on 27 December 2018 communicated on 9 December 2022 SUBJECT MATTE
CtEDO 2025-04-24
0,87
CASE OF L. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obli
CtEDO 2025-04-24
0,86
L. and Others v. France
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obli
CtEDO 2005-11-17
0,86
ROMANENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
be held liable for defamation for accurately publishing statements contained in non-confidential government documents. The Court has constantly held the view that the press “should normally be entitled, when contributing to public debate on
Sursă