ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 02.06.2016 RO

Judgment Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan - inadequate medical care in detention of two well-known human rights defenders

HOTĂRÂRE
02.06.2016
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan - inadequate medical care in detention of two well-known human rights defenders (CtEDO, 2016)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-11-07
0,88
SHANIDZE v. GEORGIA
Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 140, 22 December 2008). That standard should be “compatible with the human dignity” of a detainee, but should also take into account “the practical demands of imprisonment” (see Blokhin, cited above, §
CtEDO 2021-11-25
0,88
SUCHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 50166/13 Andrey Ivanovich SUCHKOV against Russia and 13 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 25 November 2021 as a Committee composed o
CtEDO 2018-02-20
0,88
V.S. v. ESTONIA
Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 115, 29 November 2007; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 104-106, 28 March 2006) and that, where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition, supervision is regular and systematic
CtEDO 2018-05-24
0,88
GOFMAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate medical treatment in detention) The applicants complained that they had not received adequate medical treatment in respect of their medical conditions listed in the appended table. They relied on Arti
CtEDO 2019-02-19
0,87
CASE OF MEDYANIKOV v. UKRAINE
‐ 22, 29 November 2007; Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, §§ 77 ‐ 83, 18 December 2008; and Petukhov v. Ukraine, no. 43374/02, §§ 91 ‐ 98, 21 October 2010). 31. Other relevant principles determined by the Court in its case-law as regards Arti
Sursă