Judgment Geotech Kancev GmbH v. Germany - company's obligation to participate in a social welfare fund

CtEDO 2022-09-01 0,87

U) render the proceedings unfair (see Sanofi Pasteur v. France, no. 25137/16, §§ 67-68, 13 February 2020)? Did the reasoning of the Federal Court of Justice in itself, or in conjunction with the decision of the Court of Appeal, suffice to c

CtEDO 2022-09-01 0,86

applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of her civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, did the refusal of the Federal Social Court to refer the applicant’s questions to the

CtEDO 2022-09-01 0,86

to grant the applicant’s request for a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) render the proceedings unfair (see Sanofi Pasteur v. France, no. 25137/16, §§ 67-68, 13 February 2020)? In this context, did the applicant

CtEDO 2017-09-21 0,85

Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)265 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Sandro Schneider against Germany (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 September 2017 at the 1294 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) App

CtEDO 2022-04-06 0,85

medical treatment in prisons and degrading conditions of detention (see Final Resolutions adopted in the Ghavtadze group of cases ( CM/ResDH(2014)209 and CM/ResDH(2019)298 ) and Aliev case ( CM/ResDH(2017)181 ) ); Having satisfied itself th