CtEDO 09.06.2016 RO

Judgment Pilav v. Bosnia and Herzegovina - exclusion of Bosniac politician residing in the Republika Srpska from election to the Presidency

HOTĂRÂRE
09.06.2016
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Pilav v. Bosnia and Herzegovina - exclusion of Bosniac politician residing in the Republika Srpska from election to the Presidency (CtEDO, 2016)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-03-19
0,91
PUDARIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Communicated on 19 March 2019 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 55799/18 Svetozar PUDARIĆ against Bosnia and Herzegovina lodged on 25 October 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s ineligibility to stand for e
CtEDO 2013-09-02
0,91
PILAV v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
, mutatis mutandis, Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, § 58, ECHR 2005 ‐...)? 2. Has the applicant suffered discrimination, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention, because of his inability to vote for a memb
CtEDO 2016-05-26
0,90
CASE OF ŠLAKU v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
5. The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Sarajevo. 6. The applicant belongs to BiH’s Albanian ethnic minority. He actively participates in the social and political life of the country. 7. On 26 August 2010 the applicant obtained writt
CtEDO 2016-06-09
0,90
CASE OF PILAV v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
7. The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Srebrenica, a town in the Republika Srpska (one of the two constituent Entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina). 8. The applicant declares himself as Bosniac (one of the country’s “constituent peopl
CtEDO 2020-12-08
0,89
CASE OF PUDARIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
a similar constitutional precondition has already been found to amount to a discriminatory difference in treatment in breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 in Pilav (cited above), which concerned the inability of the applicant, a Bosniac r
Sursă