CtEDO 28.06.2016 Auto

CASE OF MAGYAR KERESZTÉNY MENNONITA EGYHÁZ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT
HUN
HOTĂRÂRE
28.06.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Causal link;Costs and expenses;Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Causal link;Costs and expenses;Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Causal link;Costs and expenses;Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Causal link;Costs and expenses;Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF MAGYAR KERESZTÉNY MENNONITA EGYHÁZ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Prejudiciu material - afirmație respinsă (art. 41 - Legătura causală;Coste și cheltuieli;Dăune pecuniare;Dăune pecuniare;Dăune pecuniare;Dăunere pecuniare);Dăunere pecuniare;Dăunere pecuniare;Dăunere pecuniare;Darnere pecuniare;Darnere pecuniare;Darnere pecuniare;Darnere pecuniare;Darnere pecuniare;Coste și cheltuieli;Darne pecuniare;Darne pecuniare;Darne pecuniare;Darne pecuniare;Darne pecuniare;Darne pecuniare;Dăune pecuniare pecuniare;Dăune pecuniare;Dar satisfacție pecuniare)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-06-28
0,93
AFFAIRE MAGYAR KERESZTÉNY MENNONITA EGYHÁZ ET IZSÁK-BÁCS c. HONGRIE
Dommage matériel - demande rejetée (Article 41 - Lien de causalité;Frais et dépens;Préjudice moral;Dommage matériel;Satisfaction équitable);Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant (Article 41 - Lien de causalité;Frais et dépens;Pré
CtEDO 2015-03-10
0,91
CASE OF VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right t
CtEDO 2001-01-11
0,91
CASE OF MAGYAR v. HUNGARY
the merits, the Court is not convinced that the case became devoid of a legal object. Furthermore, for the Court, speculation about the futility of remedies used by the applicant in another set of proceedings have hardly any bearing on the
CtEDO 2012-11-08
0,91
CASE OF MIKLÓSNÉ KANYÓ v. HUNGARY
dismissing it without sufficiently comprehensive reasoning. The Court finds that this complaint goes to the fairness and the outcome of the proceedings, to be considered under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. The Court reiterates that, acco
CtEDO 2015-03-10
0,91
Varga and Others v. Hungary
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right t
Sursă