Judgment Reichman v. France - criminal proceedings may have a chilling effect on freedom of expression

CtEDO 2013-09-12 0,88

. Turkey no. 16853/05, §§ 43-64, 1 February 2011. COMPLAINT The applicant contends under Article 10 of the Convention that the institution of criminal proceedings against him constituted an unjustified interference with his right to freedom

CtEDO 2018-12-06 0,87

to give effect to the judgment, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2018)1030 ); Having noted that the violations of the right to freedom of expression d

CtEDO 2015-12-16 0,87

belonging to religious or other minorities, and that they can have a serious inhibiting effect on freedom of expression and on freedom of religion or belief; recommends that the Member States decriminalise such offences, 36....” COMPLAINT T

CtEDO 2010-09-15 0,87

Resolution CM/ResDH(2010)128 [1] Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Clément against France (Application No. 37876/02, judgment of 6 June 2006, final on 6 September 2006) The Committee of Ministers, under the ter

CtEDO 2021-02-03 0,87

Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)6 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Daniel Celimene against France (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 February 2021 at the 1394 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applicati