CtEDO 20.09.2016 RO

Judgment Karelin v. Russia - reform required for Russian administrative offence proceedings

HOTĂRÂRE
20.09.2016
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Karelin v. Russia - reform required for Russian administrative offence proceedings (CtEDO, 2016)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-01-13
0,88
CASE OF KAVKAZSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
§ 21, 28 November 2017) Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – Domestic courts denied the applicant’s motion to ensure the participation of the
CtEDO 2023-06-29
0,88
DORONIN v. RUSSIA and 34 other applications
§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019. [2] Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016. [3] Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015, and Murtazali
CtEDO 2025-12-11
0,88
CASE OF FILIPPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
blies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 Octo
CtEDO 2025-11-13
0,88
CASE OF BESPALOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§
CtEDO 2023-06-29
0,88
AZIZOV v. RUSSIA and 39 other applications
absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings; Art. 6 (3) (d) - examination/attendance of witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based.
Sursă