CtEDO 13.01.2026 RO

Judgment SIC - Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, S.A v. Portugal (no. 2) - Company ordered to pay compensation for exchange broadcast without consent

HOTĂRÂRE

13.01.2026

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2026
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment SIC - Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, S.A v. Portugal (no. 2) - Company ordered to pay compensation for exchange broadcast without consent (CtEDO, 2026)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2023-05-04

0,91

SIC - SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICAÇÃO v. PORTUGAL

95, 7 February 2012)? 3. In view of the amount that the applicant company has been ordered to pay, was the potential chilling effect on the exercise of the freedom of expression sufficiently taken into consideration by the domestic courts (

CtEDO 2023-09-04

0,89

RÁDIO E TELEVISÃO DE PORTUGAL, S.A. AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL

698/97, § 30, ECHR 2000 ‐ X; Colaço Mestre and SIC – Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, S.A. v. Portugal, nos. 11182/03 and 11319/03, §§ 22-24, 26 April 2007; and Público - Comunicação Social, S.A. and Others v. Portugal, no. 39324/07,

CtEDO 2025-03-04

0,89

CASE OF GANHÃO v. PORTUGAL

the applicant was fined EUR 2,600 and ordered to pay R. EUR 48,000 and EUR 25,000 for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage sustained respectively (see paragraph 3 above), which was disproportionate in view of the particular circumstances

CtEDO 2024-11-05

0,89

CASE OF FERREIRA E CASTRO DA COSTA LARANJO v. PORTUGAL

sanction, it is noted that in the civil proceedings lodged by M.M. against the applicant, the Lisbon Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, relying on the applicant’s criminal conviction for the impugned facts, found that M.M’s rights to pr

CtEDO 2023-10-05

0,88

GANHÃO v. PORTUGAL

by the Court in cases concerning freedom of expression (see Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no. 37698/97, § 30, ECHR 2000-X; Colaço Mestre and SIC – Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, S.A. v. Portugal, nos. 11182/03 and 11319/03, §§ 2

Sursă