Judgment T.P. and A.T. v. Hungary - legislation for reviewing whole life sentences

CtEDO 2015-03-25 0,90

v. Hungary (no. 73593/10, 20 May 2014), the Hungarian legislator introduced, on 1 January 2015, a mechanism for the mandatory review, after 40 years of imprisonment, of whole life sentences. COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 3

CtEDO 2015-03-25 0,89

review (Bfv.II.770/2007/6.). Currently, he is currently serving his sentence in Sátoraljaújhely Prison. On 5 November 2013 the President of the Republic dismissed the applicant’s request for pardon. With a view to complying with the judgmen

CtEDO 2021-11-30 0,89

nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, § 246, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Murray, cited above, §§ 99-100)? (iii) When does the system guarantee further periodic reviews of a life sentence? (b) Can the applicant’s life sentence be regarded as reducible d

CtEDO 2021-10-28 0,89

s v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069/09 and 2 others, ECHR 2013 (extracts); and László Magyar, cited above ). 40. In particular, it reiterated that the imposition of a sentence of life imprisonment on an adult offender was not in itself

CtEDO 2025-03-04 0,88

the Court to a different conclusion. 5. Having regard to the above considerations, the Court concludes that the applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention cannot be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for no