CtEDO 06.10.2016 RO

Decision Mauriello v. Italy - Failure to reimburse retirement contributions by a civil servant who had not paid enough to qualify for a pension

HOTĂRÂRE

06.10.2016

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Decision Mauriello v. Italy - Failure to reimburse retirement contributions by a civil servant who had not paid enough to qualify for a pension (CtEDO, 2016)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2016-09-13

0,87

MAURIELLO c. ITALIE

Dans une affaire relative au remboursement à ses héritiers des cotisations versées par un travailleur, la Cour constitutionnelle a considéré que, pour garantir l’équilibre financier des comptes de l’Institut national de prévoyance pour les

CtEDO 2014-06-24

0,87

CASE OF CATALDO AND OTHERS v. ITALY

8%) and in Italy (32.7%), which meant that the calculation had as its basis a pseudo-salary which amounted to approximately a quarter of the salary actually received by the applicant and therefore led to a reduction in the pension itself. 3

CtEDO 2019-01-21

0,87

FERRILLI v. ITALY

for capitalisation in use by the Istituto Nazionale Previdenza Sociale (INPS) had been applied at the time of his retirement, in compliance with Law no. 859/65 provisions, as interpreted previously? If so, was that interference provided for

CtEDO 2010-06-08

0,87

MAGGIO v. ITALY

of the Convention and its Protocols. Since no issue arises under Article 17 proper, this complaint should be rejected as being manifestly ill-founded pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court by a maj

CtEDO 2020-09-03

0,87

CASE OF GRIECO v. ITALY

2009, in view of the entry into force of Law 296/2006, the Arezzo Tribunal dismissed the applicant’s claim. RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE 8. The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the case are to be found in Maggio and Ot

Sursă