Grand Chamber Judgment Mursic v. Croatia - detention in personal space of less than 3 square metres

CtEDO 2022-07-07 0,90

23226/16 and 6 others, §§ 136 and 141, 29 January 2019). Moreover, the Government’s argument seems to be contrary to the position of Croatian courts (see, for example, the judgment of the Split County Court, no. Gž-1371/2018 of 21 August 20

CtEDO 2013-10-08 0,90

FIRST SECTION Application no. 7334/13 Kristijan MURŠIĆ against Croatia lodged on 17 December 2012 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Kristijan Muršić, is a Croatian national, who was born in 1987 and lives in Kuršanec. He is represented b

CtEDO 2019-06-18 0,90

movement. 13. The applicant submitted that the overcrowding in prison and conditions of his detention had fallen short of standards compatible with Article 3 of the Convention. The Court’s assessment 14. A restatement of the general princip

CtEDO 2023-02-09 0,89

2012 and 9 February 2013 the applicant disposed of less than 3 sq. m of floor surface (see the appended table). It further reiterates its finding in Muršić, a Grand Chamber judgment subsequent to Dolenec (cited above), that a strong presump

CtEDO 2018-12-18 0,89

les 28. The Court refers to the principles summarised in its case-law regarding conditions of detention (see Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139-59, 10