CtEDO 25.10.2016 RO

Judgment Otgon v. the Republic of Moldova - insufficient compensation after drinking infested tap water

HOTĂRÂRE
25.10.2016
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Otgon v. the Republic of Moldova - insufficient compensation after drinking infested tap water (CtEDO, 2016)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-12-01
0,88
Î.M. RESAN S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
claim compensation from company M. but it did not do so, this complaint must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Takes note of t
CtEDO 2020-09-03
0,87
CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
s in cases to which it is a party; STRONGLY URGED the Russian authorities to pay the just satisfaction and default interest owing to the applicants without further delay and to provide an action plan setting out their concrete proposals as
CtEDO 2023-09-21
0,87
CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA AND 2 OTHER CASES
that in addition to the payment of the just satisfaction, the measures for the execution of these judgments include the revocation of the “regulatory framework” at the origin of the violations, the return of the Latin-script schools to thei
CtEDO 2022-11-23
0,87
CASE OF GOSPODĂRIA ȚĂRĂNEASCĂ 'ALCAZ G.A.' AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation; Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give
CtEDO 2017-04-04
0,87
CASE OF MATANOVIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to
Sursă