Judgment Shukurov v. Azerbaijan - irregularities in the parliamentary elections of November 2010

CtEDO 2013-11-18 0,89

peal judgment of 25/11/2010; Supreme Court decision of 30/11/2010 38636/11 31/05/2011 Giyas SADIGOV 1960 Baku Intigam ALIYEV Sabirabad First Electoral Constituency No. 63, nominated by the Classic PFPA N/A 21/11/2010 Baku Court of Appeal ju

CtEDO 2017-04-13 0,88

/11/2010 Baku Court of Appeal judgment of 25/11/2010; Supreme Court decision of 01/12/2010 10 36230/11 26/05/2011 Sahib KARIMLI 1974 Shaki Hafiz HASANOV Shaki City Electoral Constituency No. 113, nominated by PFPA-Musavat CEC decision of 21

CtEDO 2015-06-11 0,88

of the Electoral Code and the Code of Civil Procedure without explaining their relevance to the facts of the case at hand, did not address any of the applicant’s arguments, and dismissed his appeal as “unsubstantiated” without providing rea

CtEDO 2020-09-08 0,88

Did the procedure for determination of candidates’ eligibility contain sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrary decisions (see Tahirov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31953/11, 11 June 2015)? 2. The parties are requested to submit copies of all docume

CtEDO 2017-04-13 0,88

4. The applicants’ years of birth and places of residence are listed in the Appendix. 5Gahramanli and Others v. Azerbaijan (no. 36503/11, §§ 6-32, 8 October 2015). 6. The applicants were independent self-nominated or opposition candidates i