ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 12.12.2024 RO

Decision Uçar v. Türkiye - complaints brought by tank commander involved in the 2016 attempted coup d’état rejected as inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
12.12.2024
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Decision Uçar v. Türkiye - complaints brought by tank commander involved in the 2016 attempted coup d’état rejected as inadmissible (CtEDO, 2024)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-05-29
0,90
ÖZTEKİN v. TURKEY
the Court finds that the applicants’ complaints concerning the inadequacy of the judicial response in the aftermath of the incident are manifestly ill ‐ founded and must be declared inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 o
CtEDO 2020-10-20
0,89
URUÇ v. TURKEY
complaint has not been raised by the applicant before the Court, even in substance. Accordingly, this part of the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For
CtEDO 2021-03-30
0,89
ACAR AND ÖZ v. TURKEY
ed them before the relevant domestic authorities or courts before lodging their applications with the Court. It follows that those complaints must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for failure to exhaust domestic rem
CtEDO 2024-01-09
0,89
AKTAY v. TÜRKİYE
(a) and must as such be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention. 52. That conclusion dispenses the Court from having to address any of the other grounds of inadmissibility put forth by the Government. For these reasons,
CtEDO 2016-09-27
0,89
YÜCEL v. TURKEY
finds that the applicant’s submissions do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that this part of the application must be declared inadmissible as manife
Sursă