CtEDO 22.11.2016 Auto

CASE OF KERMAN v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
22.11.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded);Remainder inadmissible (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Brought promptly before judge or other officer);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
CASE OF KERMAN v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistare inadmisibilă (art. 35-3 - Pronunțare inadmisibilă (art. 34 - Victima);Violare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-3 - Introducere prompt în fața judecătorului sau a altor ofițer);Violare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5 - Revizuirea legalității de deținere);Violare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-5 - Compensare);Prejudiciu material - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Să satisfacție); prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Să satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-11-22
1,00
Kerman v. Turkey
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded);Remainder inadmissible (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Brought promptly before judge or other officer);Violation of A
CtEDO 2021-06-29
0,96
CASE OF TERCAN v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article
CtEDO 2021-06-29
0,96
CASE OF TERCAN v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,96
CASE OF AKGÜN v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of
CtEDO 2020-03-03
0,96
CASE OF BAȘ v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law);Viol
Sursă