Judgment Sarihan v. Turkey - sufficient measures taken to protect people against landmines

CtEDO 2018-10-17 0,88

in proceedings challenging the lawfulness of their detention (see Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)91 the case of of Karaosmanoğlu and Özden ); Recalling that the Committee of Ministers’ decisions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convent

CtEDO 2022-11-03 0,88

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)294 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Sarar against Turkey (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 November 2022 at the 1447 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No. C

CtEDO 2016-09-21 0,88

Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)271 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Four cases against Turkey Application No. Case Date of the decision 10730/09 Lokman ASLAN 13/01/2015 35702/08+ EROĞLU AND OTHERS 24/05/2011 20518/

CtEDO 2025-11-07 0,88

that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicant was acquitted in a final judgment; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment

CtEDO 2025-09-03 0,88

with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in this case because of the applicable prescription periods; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgme