CtEDO 08.12.2016 RO

Decision Colonna v. France - application complaining of breaches of right to be presumed innocent found inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
08.12.2016
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Decision Colonna v. France - application complaining of breaches of right to be presumed innocent found inadmissible (CtEDO, 2016)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-01-22
0,89
PORSENNA v. MALTA
present case, in view of the 2014 amendments, it cannot be said that the law which applied to the applicant failed to satisfy the foreseeability requirement or to provide effective safeguards against arbitrary punishment as provided for in
CtEDO 2016-11-15
0,89
COLONNA c. FRANCE
pour connaître des allégations formulées, la Cour ne relève aucune apparence de violation des droits et libertés garantis par les articles précités de la Convention. Il s’ensuit que ces griefs sont manifestement mal fondés et doivent être r
CtEDO 2003-02-04
0,88
DURINGER and OTHERS and GRUNGE v. FRANCE [Extracts]
doubt whatsoever that it constitutes an abuse of the right of application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It follows that the applications lodged by Mr Gérard Duringer and Mr Forest Grunge must be declared inadmissib
CtEDO 2025-09-04
0,88
CASE OF E.A. AND ASSOCIATION EUROPÉENNE CONTRE LES VIOLENCES FAITES AUX FEMMES AU TRAVAIL v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - R
CtEDO 2003-06-03
0,88
MOREL v. FRANCE
charge” against the applicant. The Court can only conclude that the proceedings of which the applicant complains did not involve the determination of a “criminal charge” within the meaning of the aforementioned Article 6 § 1. In those circu
Sursă